16.05.2021, 20:52   #1

Hobbyfotograf

When you photograph animals.....

Suggestion
I haven’t been active in the Photo Club for very long, but I think I’m right in saying that most of the photos are landscapes/nature, and within that, most feature animals. Now, most of the animals photographed are ones that usually live in our “home” environment—that is, animals we all more or less recognize. That’s usually no problem when it comes to songbirds or common animals like dogs, cats, mice, deer, stags, or foxes. But it gets a bit trickier with insects, amphibians, and so on.
My suggestion is to include the genus/species of the subject in the description whenever possible. Often, just a quick look and a search term (yes, maybe two or three) on Wikipedia is enough for anyone viewing the photo to know exactly what it is.

What do you think?
16.05.2021, 21:37   #2

Hobbyfotograf

You're right, Uwe. Especially since this approach allows you to engage more deeply with your subject, showing it greater respect.
17.05.2021, 17:58   #3
Profilfoto
Matthias Polakowski

That's true; I completely agree. Sometimes it's easier, sometimes harder to achieve a result.
But you’ve spent a bit more time on it.
By the way, this doesn’t just apply to the Animals section. I think it would be nice in general if there was a bit more information under the photos sometimes—for example, with landscape shots, where exactly the photo was taken. 
17.05.2021, 18:32   #4

Hobbyfotografin

That's absolutely right, Uwe, and I completely agree with Stefan and Matthias on this.
For almost all my pictures, I try to provide background information for exactly these reasons. If someone is only interested in the image, a bit of info won’t bother them, and for those who want to know where a photo was taken or which animal or species it shows, they don’t have to ask. I think this suggestion is quite good.
19.05.2021, 08:18   #5

Hobbyfotografin

Since Uwe’s post, I’ve been seriously diving into searching for names on Google... Unfortunately, I find the whole task quite challenging—especially with many insects, butterflies, and caterpillars, where often no name can be found at all. No matter how hard I try! 😉 For me personally, the name is secondary. What matters is that I can enjoy the image of the creature, no matter what it’s called.
19.05.2021, 09:28   #6
Profilfoto
Karl-Heinz Sauer

For me, it’s all about the image, and if I want to know more than the photographer is willing or able to share, I just go online myself! It’s that simple for me!
Just my personal take, mind you!
Cheers, Okasa
19.05.2021, 17:45   #7
Profilfoto
Matthias Polakowski

@Janet Kölliker and Karl-Heinz Sauer
Don’t get me wrong. Of course, not having an explanation doesn’t turn a great photo into a bad one, nor does it make a good photo undeserving of positive comments. But I just think it’s nice when, for example, someone shares where their city photo was taken. This isn’t meant to be a rule or anything like that.
When it’s a shot over a field of rapeseed, that’s obviously unnecessary and clear; it also happens to me that I photograph an insect and have no idea what it is. No one knows everything (and that would be pretty boring anyway). So, no need to get upset; it was just a friendly request/suggestion... 🙂
19.05.2021, 20:07   #8

Hobbyfotografin

@Matthias Polakowski Who said I’m upset??... And I never mentioned landscape photography, or city... place... etc.—only insects and animals.
No one here is upset 🙂
19.05.2021, 20:18   #9
Profilfoto
Matthias Polakowski

@Janet Kölliker
Ah... don’t take it so literally right away... 🙂
All good 🙂 I take back the "getting upset," I didn’t mean it literally either....
19.05.2021, 20:21   #10

Hobbyfotografin

@Matthias Polakowski All good, Matthias... I already understood you 😉 Have a great evening
20.05.2021, 21:16   #11

Smartphotographer

@Janet Kölliker I feel the same way—if I’m not familiar with something, I just don’t mention it...
21.05.2021, 17:57   #12

Profifotograf

I personally almost always include information about where and what I’m photographing. Of course, that can be tricky with certain large groups of animals since I’m not an expert. But I also use it for my own archive by asking if anyone recognizes the insect or whatever it is. With so many people here, someone’s usually seen it before. 🙂

I’m fundamentally interested in what I’m photographing, especially when it comes to animals. If it’s unplanned, then at least I try to find out afterward.

I think it also depends on whether you’re someone who takes photos of animals on vacation or outings when they happen to appear (which definitely doesn’t mean you can’t get great shots that way), or if you’re more deeply involved, focusing on it and maybe even planning photo trips around specific species.

That said, just to mention it again: I appreciate it when others add this kind of info, but I’m not bothered if they don’t.
21.05.2021, 19:40   #13
Profilfoto
Matthias Polakowski

@Korbinian Ring You nailed it. That’s exactly what I wanted to say, but I just couldn’t quite find the right words! 🙂
31.05.2021, 17:52   #14

Hobbyfotograf

@Uwe Bauer

Hi Uwe, That's a great idea, and I completely agree.

Cheers, Rolf  
Statistics - 952 Hits | 14 Posts